AS A PARENT ARE YOU AWARE THAT…
° Media personalities and parent information sites are being used by big pharma to make you buy their products, including vaccines?
° Media companies are using NATIVE advertising on you?
Vaccination has been made into a controversial topic by the Australian media. Parents are constantly bombarded online with various articles and group chats. These are instantly appealing for parents who usually have a lot of questions. They also give the often isolated parent a way to feel connected. This style of blogs, chats and articles is typically portrayed as safe, mainline medically approved and well-balanced.
What many people fail to see is the agenda behind this media and the large amounts of money to be made. Mia Freedman, is one such example. She founded the very successful media company Mamamia. Her wealth is public knowledge.
Mamamia has been sponsored by the NSW Health Department to promote vaccination for children. Mia Freedman has been the face of the Save The Date To Vaccinate App and has recently launched an advertorial promoting the White Noise App – to help calm screaming babies during vaccination appointments. See Mamamia with NSW Health – Paid partnership.’
Advertisers, such as NSW health, believe that if they pay Mia Freedman they can have a ‘momservation’ with the average Australian mum, especially about vaccination. The technique used here is NATIVE advertising.
NATIVE advertising is a type of disguised advertising, usually online, that matches the form and function of the platform upon which it appears.
This can also be clearly seen in another example of Mamamia advertising. The Mamamia media company was hired by pharmaceutical giant Glaxosmithkline to advertise children’s Nurofen and Panadol. Mia Freedman then wrote an article called, ‘Refusing pain medication for yourself or your kids does not earn you smug points.”
Her opening lines are, “ I love drugs. I really do. Always have. Not the illegal kind so much.”
Mamamia is proud of their work. “The Mamamia Network is leading the Australian market in native advertising,” said Jamila Rivzi, former Editor in Chief of Mamamia media company.
Despite the fact that founder Mia Freedman has admitted that she’s done no independent research into vaccines, this pro-vaccine media company has conditioned their readers to vilify anyone that refuses to support mandatory vaccination.
THE MEDIA PUBLICLY ATTACKS PARENTS THAT SPEAK UP
Mamamia’s paid support to push vaccine sales crosses even more lines of basic human decency. It does this by publicly humiliating anyone that threatens the sales figures of their advertised products.
This was clearly seen recently when Shanelle Cartwright, wife of NRL player Bryce Cartwright, admitted on Instagram that she’s made an informed choice not to vaccinate their children.
The Cartwright’s vaccination decision had repercussions across the media. A number of angry articles appeared, including one on Mamamia, ‘Why we need to talk about Shanelle Cartwright’s refusal to vaccinate her children.’
The Mamamia article provoked the usual nasty comments from their readers such as, ‘People who choose not to vaccinate their children are f/&*g idiots.’ This, and other comments on the site, shows that Mamamia readers have been successfully indoctrinated by mainstream media and native advertising. Overall, the media backlash had the effect of completely censoring the other side of the vaccination debate.
HATE SPEECH HAS BEEN PROMOTED BY THE MEDIA
The most worrying part of this trend is that it has led to the acceptance of hate speech against Australian parents and defenseless, and sometimes very damaged, young children.
WHAT THE MEDIA WON’T TELL YOU ABOUT VACCINES
Here’s what Mamamia and other media won’t tell you, because they don’t want to upset their advertisers.
Herd immunity is always assumed in the media as the reason we must have mandatory vaccination. One Mamamia article quotes Dr Keang-Sing Lim, a GP, who says, “Someone not vaccinating, is someone not being a team player.”
HERD IMMUNITY NONSENSE
However, vaccine herd immunity isn’t backed up with real science. Lifelong immunity can only be achieved by getting diseases, such as measles or chicken pox. Any vaccine immunity wanes over time, thus the need for boosters.
This is confirmed, surprisingly, in the Murdoch press article ‘Why we must never forget Dana McCaffery.’
(Adrienne Tam, Stellar Magazine, February 17, 2019
“They were not told that adults, too, need whooping cough boosters because immunity wanes after a decade, meaning that around 90 per cent of adults no longer have adequate protection against this deadly disease.”
Interestingly, most of the people in the media commenting on the Cartright’s vaccination decision wouldn’t be up-to-date with their own vaccinations. Theoretically, they are as ‘dangerous’ as any unvaccinated child.
THE NUREMBERG CODE
There is also a concern that if we mandate medical procedures, like vaccination, then we go down the road to fascism. This is why the Nuremberg code was put into place after World War ll. The Nuremberg Code is a set of ethical guidelines regarding human experimentation. There are no independent scientific studies clearing vaccine adjuvants, such as aluminum, mercury (thimerasol), and others, to be indisputably safe for use in the human body. This equals human experimentation.
See the book, ‘Vaccines and Autoimmunity.’ Dr Yehuda Shoenfeld, and others.
“In light of the discovery of Autoimmune Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants, or ASIA, Vaccines and Autoimmunity explores the role of adjuvants – specifically aluminum in different vaccines – and how they can induce diverse autoimmune clinical manifestations in genetically prone individuals.
Edited by leaders in the field, Vaccines and Autoimmunity is an invaluable resource for advanced students and researchers working in pathogenic and epidemiological studies.”
ARE AUSTRALIAN VACCINES MADE HERE?
The worldwide vaccine development and manufacturing process is actually very different to what the average Australian believes it to be. See, ‘Where are Australia’s vaccines made?’ Dr Judy Wilyman PhD
US NATIONAL VACCINE INJURY PROGRAM
There has been over $3.7 billion dollars paid out in vaccine injury/death claims by the United States National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.
“…a vaccine can cause a serious problem, such as a severe allergic reaction. In these instances, the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) may provide financial compensation to individuals who file a petition and are found to have been injured by a VICP-covered vaccine…”
Australia has no vaccine injury compensation scheme. This suits the government and pharmaceutical companies, not the people. They do not want people aware of vaccine damage. They do not want to pay compensation.
The US Supreme Court has also explicitly stated that vaccines are ‘unavoidably unsafe.’
VACCINES WERE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DECLINE IN INFECTIOUS DISEASE DEATHS
“Infectious diseases in Australia were controlled by 1950. Only diptheria vaccine was in use at this time and this was in voluntary vaccination campaigns…
Measles, whooping cough and influenza were removed from the national notifiable disease list in 1950 because the deaths and serious illness to these diseases had been significantly reduced for the majority of children.”
From Judy Wilyman PhD.
It is important to have access to government statistics to check if statements made in the media are accurate. The graphs in the following article are based on official government statistics for infectious disease deaths. Importantly, the huge decline in infectious disease deaths that occurred BEFORE vaccines were introduced, or widespread, actually occurred in other developed countries, too.
BOTH OUR STATE AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENTS WORK CLOSELY WITH THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY
This discussion would be incomplete without an explanation of how our government health departments work together with pharmaceutical companies. People typically have no idea how this works and how it is occurring worldwide. To put it simply, all our government boards and committees, that set our vaccination policies and schedules, contain members that have financial ties to the vaccine industry.
See, ‘Conflicts of interest in vaccination policy.’
THE FUTURE MONEY IS IN THE VACCINE INDUSTRY
According to international market reports, the global vaccine market is predicted to rise from US$5.7 billion in 2002, to more than US$77.5 billion in 2024, a more than 13 fold increase.
The World Health Organisation (WHO) has indicated we are experiencing a vaccine boom. An article published in New Scientist in late 2011 says: “No longer the unprofitable runt of the pharmaceutical family, vaccines are fast becoming the industry’s breadwinner…While the rest of the pharmaceutical sector struggles to keep afloat as expiring patents send profits plummeting, the vaccine industry has become remarkably buoyant”.
In 2009, Associated Press reported: “Vaccines now are viewed as a crucial path to growth, as drug companies look for ways to offset a slowing of prescription-medicine sales amid intensifying generic competition and government pressure to restrain prices under the federal health-care overhaul”.
Source for the above 3 paragraphs, and all references, found under, ‘VACCINES ARE BIG BUSINESS, WORTH BILLIONS OF DOLLARS ON AN INTERNATIONAL BASIS’ Elizabeth Hart https://over-vaccination.net/
SO WHAT DOES IT ALL MEAN?
Profits are unlimited. Doctors benefit. Lobbyists and politicians collude. Scientists are bought. Media outlets, such as Mamamia, work hard to ‘educate’ us all with native advertising and biased news reports Their end goal is for us to accept this violation of the most basic of all human rights – the right against human medical experimentation. In the end, we all have no protection against this massive worldwide industry of medicine for profit, rather than health.
Further reading and viewing:
Written by Jill Dunn